This study falls under a wider piece of look to your category relationships and related thinking into various other public organizations. All members was indeed tested immediately following providing the consent in writing. Participants have been assured anonymity to complete some papers-and-pen surveys on ATLG strategies privately. Volunteers gotten extra credit circumstances due to their direction grade. The latest moral conditions of one’s Chilean Search Percentage (CONICYT) was accompanied.
As well, political mind-categorization (asking on the political needs coded into about three groups: remaining, cardio and you may right) and you may sexual positioning had been integrated
Professionals replied market issues to check ATLG authenticity: gender, age, socioeconomic status (large, middle and lower levels were utilized), and you may faith character as a consequence of self-reporting on the treatment for issue “You think oneself a religious person?” At exactly the same time, a 4-goods size scale toward a good six-point Likert size concerning your importance participants share with the religious suggestions inside their day-after-day life was applied.
It was developed in Northern America. ATLG is measured on a 6-point Likert scale. The instrument was translated and adapted (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008) (see the Appendix). The ATLG Spanish language version in this study had not been used with Chilean populations before. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for ATLG; 0.88 for ATL; and 0.91 for ATG (The ATLG and the two subscales demonstrated good internal consistence for this sample. The correlation for the two subscales is high (r (503) = 0.84; p < 0.001). ATLG overall mean was 3.52 (SD = 0.75).
Large (close to six) scores demonstrated better bias, and you will low scores reported positive perceptions into the homosexuals
Area of the mission were to influence the underlying ATLG grounds structure. Thus, around three grounds activities was in fact estimated: a single-factor design (ATLG includes one homophobia cause of hence every activities saturate); a-two-grounds synchronised model (two size made because of the ATL and ATG subscales whose things is saturate from the associated foundation are proposed) an additional order design that have two coordinated affairs (in which ATG subscale issues manage saturate in 2 size – homosexual Values and you may Character – and the ones of your ATL level perform saturate about other three – lesbian Conventional Viewpoints, and you may Public Approve and Societal Liberties). Such five dimensions was basically taken from analyses done in early in the day degree (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008).
Generally speaking, new match is better when model factors try improved. Thus, both-grounds second-order design is one of parsimonious for all indexes received. CFI (Relative Enhance Directory) and you will NFI (Typical Complement Directory) spiders inform you philosophy more 0.nine, all of them considered decent (Bentler Dudgeon, 1996). RFI (Relative Develop List) well worth means 0.9, particularly in the 5-basis model. While doing so, RMSEA (Root Mean-square Mistake of Approximation) index are tall that have thinking less than 0.08 (Browne Kudeck, 1993), ergo confirming a knowledgeable fit of the four-factor design.
Table 3 also shows the factor saturations for each of the five sub-scales model items. All standardized saturations were significant (p < 0.001). All of the 20 items of the standardized solution loaded on the general grouping factor in the expected direction. The relation between the five latent factors is as follows (covariance): the dimension Social Rights has a high positive correlation with the factor Nature (r = 0.6); moderate positive with both Social Rights (r = 0.43) and Social Sanction (r = 0.038); and high positive with Traditional Values (r = 0.74). The dimension Nature is moderately and positively correlated with Social Rights (r = 0.32) and Social Sanction (r = 0.35), but highly and positively correlated with Traditional Values (r = 0.61). The relation of the dimension Social Rights with Social Sanction (r = 0.31) and Traditional Values (r = 0.37) is moderate high. Finally, the relation between Traditional Values and Social Sanction is moderate positive (r = 0.43).